November6
K just turned 2 on Saturday. Two years! I can’t believe I have a two year old. Crazy. Some of our friends and family know this, and some don’t, but Kael is still nursing, or STILL nursing depending on your perspective.
I know that people think if a child can verbalize their desire for mom’s milk, they don’t need it. I know that it’s definitely not the popular thing to do. I know that some people think it’s weird. I know all that.
It’s still the right choice for me to continue nursing Kael though. Extended nursing (past one year of age) has benefits for both mom and baby. Some benefits for the baby are the increased nutrition and fats that are in breastmilk compared to cow’s milk. Some of the benefits for mom are the decreased risks of several types of cancer, osteoperosis, and rheumatoid arthritis.
I know that in the US, there are many women who set their breastfeeding goal for 12 months. For a while, that was my goal, too. Then, when K turned one, I realized that November 4th wasn’t any different than November 3rd. Just because he was one and 1 day didn’t change anything for me or for him. I was still okay with breastfeeding, and he still wanted and needed it. He may have been able to drink cow’s milk instead of breastmilk for his liquid intake, but he has always been a child who needed his “mommy time.”
When he was young, he was easily overwhelmed and overstimulated. Nursing was one thing that would calm him down and sometimes keep him from progressing into a meltdown. As he grew older, he was more able to handle the stimuli, but nursing remained (and still remains) important to him. It’s a form of security and comfort, and his need for those things is just as real and as important as his nutritional needs are.
My goal for nursing him is to allow him to self-wean. If I were to become pregnant before I weaned him, I might encourage weaning, because I wouldn’t want to tandem nurse (nurse K & A) while pregnant, but if that doesn’t happen, we’ll continue to go at his pace.